Women should be allowed to vote! (?)

Okay, it was 90 years ago.

An op-ed in the NYT by Christine Stansell commemorates the 90th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment, Women’s Suffrage. Though I should have known, I had no idea how much resistance there was to the idea that a woman should be able to vote. The most persistent opposition occurred in the South. The story gets pretty dramatic:

Thirty-six of the 48 states then needed to ratify [the amendment]. Western states did so promptly, and in the North only Vermont and Connecticut delayed. But the segregated South saw in the 19th Amendment a grave threat: the removal of the most comprehensive principle for depriving an entire class of Americans of full citizenship rights. The logic of women’s disenfranchisement helped legitimize relegating blacks to second-class citizenship.

Female voters would also pose practical difficulties, described bluntly by a Mississippi man: “We are not afraid to maul a black man over the head if he dares to vote, but we can’t treat women, even black women, that way. No, we’ll allow no woman suffrage.”

Nine Southern states joined by Delaware forced ratification to a halt, one state short. Only Tennessee was left, and the opposition had good reason to think it would line up with the rest of the region. But after a nine-day special session in the heat of August 1920, a legislator pledged to the nays jumped ship — he later said it was because his mother told him to — and the 36th state was in.

That wasn’t the end of the struggle, by any means:

Even then, in several Southern states, die-hards went to court to invalidate the amendment, stopping only after the Supreme Court in 1922 unanimously dismissed their arguments.

In 1923 Delaware ratified belatedly to join the rest of the country, but the Southern states waited decades: Maryland in 1941, Virginia in 1952, Alabama in 1953. Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina and South Carolina came along from 1969 to 1971, years after the Voting Rights Act of 1965 had passed. Mississippi brought up the rear, not condoning the right of women to vote until 1984.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in American Society. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Women should be allowed to vote! (?)

  1. Ray Harris says:

    When I registered to vote in Georgia in 1956 only one other state allowed 18 year olds to vote, I think it was Kentucky (memory, not research). Another young man was registering for the first time and the registrar asked his young pregnant wife if she wanted to register too. She was blown away that anyone would think she could/should vote. Her redneck husband could not believe the registrar would even ask. BTW, from that election to now I have not missed a presidential election.

    The 26th Amendment allowing all American 18 year olds to vote was not passed until 1971. Looking back, and reflecting on 18 year olds’ maturity, I am not sure it was/is a great idea. But if they can vote, why can’t they drink? To be the “Land of the Free” we Americans sure worry a lot about allowing/restricting other people’s rights.

  2. I think 18 year olds don’t get to drink legally because drinking is more dangerous than voting, expecially when young people add driving to their drinking. (Of course, it’s not more dangerous than going to war, which is perfectly legal.)

    • Ray Harris says:

      The drinking age was lowered to 18 most places during the Vietnam horror years, the reasoning being that if the boys were old enough to be drafted and slaughtered they ought to be able to legally order a beer. Then under Reagan, this was reversed and has resulted in a lot of illegal drinking that should be legal. Seriously, we have made criminals out of 20 year olds who were caught at the keg party.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/morris-e-chafetz/the-21-year-old-drinking_b_262264.html

      I was sitting in Magistrate’s Court a few years back being lectured for my heavy foot, when I was horrified by how many of the defendents were 19 and 20 year old guys who were prosecuted for having a couple of drinks (not DUIs). It just doesn’t make any sense to me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s